Government Intervention and its Spillover Effects

One of my cousins is a Chief Executive Engineer for Pakistan's Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA), currently working in Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). He recently submitted a proposal to Pakistan's Ministry of Planning and Development. He shared insights with me about the political and bureaucratic challenges in the country. I would like to provide the reader with some background information on this topic.

My cousin is a dedicated individual who aims to improve the lives of underprivileged people in Gilgit-Baltistan. Due to a lack of self-determination, GB is an impoverished region in Pakistan. The area is rich in natural resources, which are vital for the livelihoods of its residents. The local population relies on various industries, including mining, tourism, fishing, agriculture, fruit production, and handicrafts. These sectors serve as the primary sources of income for most people in the region.

People rely on the government for jobs, education, transportation, and healthcare. The territory lacks self-determination and operates under a top-down decision-making process. It does not collect taxes and depends on federal funding, subsidies, and grants. Compared to Pakistan, this area has a relatively low level of corruption.

Gilgit-Baltistan has a significant hydropower potential of 40,000 megawatts (MW), yet it currently generates only 133 MW. This limited energy production is a critical issue for the region's 1.8 million residents. Pakistan as a whole is grappling with an electricity crisis and relies heavily on imported fuels to meet its energy demands, which places a considerable strain on the country's GDP. Harnessing Gilgit-Baltistan's hydropower potential could help alleviate Pakistan's energy challenges and strengthen its foreign exchange reserves. However, the region faces challenges such as a lack of self-determination and bureaucratic hurdles. There are 278 potential project sites in Gilgit-Baltistan that, if developed, could increase the total installed capacity by 21,125 MW.

The federal government of Pakistan provides funding to Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), as the GB government does not collect taxes or generate its own revenue. Consequently, the GB government must seek approval from the federal government even for minor projects. Political conflicts among various parties at both the central and local levels further complicate the situation in GB. As a result, development projects can take several months or even years to be initiated. The GB government often encounters obstacles in obtaining consent from the Planning and Development Department and the Ministry of Kashmir Affairs. Projects may stall or fail altogether if politicians or bureaucrats do not receive their expected benefits.

My cousin visited officials from various ministries in Islamabad to discuss his proposal with the federal government. He has been working on this initiative for an extended period and presented it during his meetings. He is a capable individual who installed smart energy meters in Gilgit-Baltistan (GB), where most residents do not pay their power bills. This installation has helped the Water and Power Department monitor electrical consumption, and as a result, the department now generates the majority of the income for the GB government.

He shared the bureaucratic challenges he encountered during his visit to Islamabad. He identified several potential hydropower sites in Gilgit-Baltistan (GB). All he needed was approval to establish contact with international companies. His goal is to export electricity to China. He estimated that this initiative would be profitable for the people of GB, as each household could receive Rs. 300,000 per month in compensation.

The interests of the ruling parties and bureaucracy often lead to the stalling of numerous initiatives. The federally controlled Water and Power Department (WPD) aims to maintain its monopoly and restricts competition from the private sector. The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) serves as Pakistan's primary power service provider and holds a monopoly on the construction of infrastructure for electricity distribution. This monopoly creates significant barriers for other businesses trying to enter the market. 

The government of Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) needs to develop infrastructure to export energy to China. However, the entrenched interests of NEPRA and WPD impede this progress, preventing the GB government from entering into open contracts to develop necessary infrastructure.

Widespread corruption has led to the dysfunction of nearly every public sector in the country. Due to the weak rule of law, politicians and bureaucrats exploit public funds and power for personal gain.

Gilgit-Baltistan struggles to launch public welfare projects due to a lack of autonomy and the ability to manage its own affairs. The political turmoil and corruption within Pakistan's government exacerbate these challenges. The ad hoc government in Gilgit-Baltistan follows directives from the central government and the army, failing to address the concerns of the local population. Since gaining independence in 1947, the region has faced ongoing issues regarding self-determination and individual rights. Political and administrative obstacles have stunted the development of Gilgit-Baltistan. While some capable individuals seek to bring about change, power struggles between the civilian administration and the army continue to hinder progress in Pakistan.

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Iran an ungrateful nation?

Protest in the Sost Dry-port

The global consequences of the American war on Iran.